AISTATS · 2026

Leveraging Machine-Learned Advice in Strategic Interactions with No-Regret Learners

Tinashe Handina, Tongxin Li, Kishan Panaganti, Eric Mazumdar, Adam Wierman

Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics

How useful is imperfect advice against an adaptive opponent?

A measure of advice quality connects simulators and payoff predictions to strategic performance. The paper establishes benefits of reliable advice for approximate Stackelberg play and limitations on simultaneously exploiting accurate advice and protecting against inaccurate advice.

Research themes

Connections

Prediction errors become strategic risks

In strategic environments, advice quality affects both opportunity and risk. The Bayesian game and repeated game results expose limits on combining exploitation with protection against inaccurate beliefs.

Open questions

Accountable learning across agents

How should shared models balance efficiency, strategic risk, and equity?

Explore open directions

Cite this paper

Tinashe Handina, Tongxin Li, Kishan Panaganti, Eric Mazumdar, Adam Wierman. Leveraging Machine-Learned Advice in Strategic Interactions with No-Regret Learners. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2026. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10261

BibTeX
@inproceedings{tongxin-strategic-advice,
  title = {{Leveraging Machine-Learned Advice in Strategic Interactions with No-Regret Learners}},
  author = {Tinashe Handina and Tongxin Li and Kishan Panaganti and Eric Mazumdar and Adam Wierman},
  year = {2026},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10261}
}
2024NeurIPS

Safe Exploitative Play with Untrusted Type Beliefs

Tongxin Li, Tinashe Handina, Shaolei Ren, Adam Wierman

The paper formalizes a risk and opportunity tradeoff for agents with uncertain beliefs about other players. Upper and lower bounds characterize the Pareto frontier in normal form and stochastic Bayesian games, with numerical illustrations of the tradeoff.

How much risk comes from exploiting a predicted opponent type? game theory learning in games Bayesian games Stackelberg strategies equity public models learning augmented algorithms algorithms with predictions competitive analysis robustness consistency online optimization