POMACS · 2026

Prediction-Specific Design of Learning-Augmented Algorithms

Sizhe Li, Nicolas Christianson, Tongxin Li

Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems

Can an algorithm be optimal for the particular prediction it receives?

Strong optimality refines the usual consistency and robustness tradeoff to account for each prediction. A bilevel optimization framework constructs algorithms for ski rental and one max search, with case studies in power management and trading.

Research themes

Open questions

Prediction quality as a decision resource

Which prediction errors actually matter for the decision being made?

Explore open directions

Cite this paper

Sizhe Li, Nicolas Christianson, Tongxin Li. Prediction-Specific Design of Learning-Augmented Algorithms. Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1145/3788100

BibTeX
@article{tongxin-prediction-specific,
  title = {{Prediction-Specific Design of Learning-Augmented Algorithms}},
  author = {Sizhe Li and Nicolas Christianson and Tongxin Li},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/3788100},
  doi = {10.1145/3788100}
}

Other versions

2026AISTATS

Leveraging Machine-Learned Advice in Strategic Interactions with No-Regret Learners

Tinashe Handina, Tongxin Li, Kishan Panaganti, Eric Mazumdar, Adam Wierman

A measure of advice quality connects simulators and payoff predictions to strategic performance. The paper establishes benefits of reliable advice for approximate Stackelberg play and limitations on simultaneously exploiting accurate advice and protecting against inaccurate advice.

How useful is imperfect advice against an adaptive opponent? game theory learning in games Bayesian games Stackelberg strategies equity public models learning augmented algorithms algorithms with predictions competitive analysis robustness consistency online optimization
2026IEEE PES International Meeting

PEARL: A Physics-Enhanced Adaptive Residual Learning Framework for PV Modeling

Yikai Lu, Yujie Chen, Tongxin Li

PEARL separates a physical photovoltaic simulator from a learned residual correction. A controlled benchmark compares several machine learning architectures and a coupled modeling baseline, examining accuracy while retaining the physical model as an interpretable reference.

Can learned residuals improve physical models of solar generation? AI for energy electric vehicle charging demand response renewable energy load forecasting decarbonization learning augmented algorithms algorithms with predictions competitive analysis robustness consistency online optimization
2026IEEE Control Systems Letters

VigilMPC: Certified Online Tube Model Predictive Control for Safe Real-Time Neuromodulation

Yu Mao, Zhichao Liang, Junxiang Zhang, Quanying Liu, Tongxin Li

VigilMPC accepts a predictor update only when a backup plan remains feasible under tightened constraints. Recursive feasibility and constraint satisfaction follow under the tube MPC assumptions. Evaluation uses simulated neural dynamics and a switching benchmark, rather than clinical deployment.

Can a predictive controller safely update its learned dynamics online? model predictive control MPC stability recursive feasibility distributed control system level synthesis learning augmented algorithms algorithms with predictions competitive analysis robustness consistency online optimization